Studies show that for every 20-minutes we spend planning and preparing for meetings, we save 60-minutes in rework down the line.
Why don't we consistently spend this critical 20-minutes?
So many people spend their days reacting to the intensity of their calendars. By rushing from meeting to meeting we tend to show up in meetings with very little clarity. Do we even know the purpose of every meeting scheduled on our calendar this week?
Without clarity about the purpose of a meeting, participants have little clarity about how decisions will evolve and resources will be allocated as a result of a meeting.
Worse, we have little understanding of our individual role in the context of this meeting.
To make meetings meaningful (and thereby much more productive) take 20-minutes prior to each meeting to get clear on these important issues:
1. What is the purpose of this meeting? Is it a standing committee, a team meeting or an ad hoc meeting for one purpose? Will decisions actually be made in this meeting? Will resources be allocated as a result of this meeting? Do I need additional data in order to be prepared to discuss issues from a strategic perspective.
2. What is my objective for this meeting? How might I move my related priorities forward during this meeting?
3. What is my role in this meeting? Am I the sole decision-maker? Am I there to add context or be briefed? Am I a member of a team that will drive solutions as a result of this meeting?
4. Do we have an official scribe for this meeting? Do we have a track record of documenting action items in a meaningful way that produce effective follow-up and real results?
5. Have I received an agenda for this meeting? Do the agenda items make sense, given the purpose of the meeting?
If you aren't strategic and proactive in preparing for meetings, you guarantee frustration and wasted resources in your very next meeting.
Your colleagues who have least amount of transparency about themselves will be disruptive by dominating the meeting and will drive the few, off-strategy outcomes.
It's your choice.
Thanks Katharine - you are right, meetings can be a huge "time waster!" I like your recommendations, especially the idea of outlining the decisions that will be made at the meeting.
ReplyDeleteMost meetings seem to be set for 1 hour but they rarely seem to need all that time. How - about trying 30 or 45 minutes instead, force people to be succinct and to make decisions?
And many meetings seem to get dominated by one or two people. When you need to make a decision going around the table giving everyone the opportunity to ask a question and then doing it again to get everyone's recommendation before a decision is made (I find that the decision is often obvious after doing this.)
Thanks Katharine,
Tim